Skip to main content
Pillar 3 of 4

Quality Scored, Not Assumed.

Three judges. Statistical consensus. Not one model's opinion.

THE PROCESS

How Reports Get Scored

No single model evaluates itself. Quality requires independent judgment.

Three Independent Models

Each report is evaluated by three different AI models independently.

Eight Quality Dimensions

Each judge scores across 8 dimensions using calibrated rubrics.

Statistical Consensus

Bradley-Terry calibration ensures consensus, not compromise.

EIGHT DIMENSIONS

What Gets Measured

Every report scored across 8 quality dimensions. Transparent. Repeatable.

Quality ScorecardSample Report
Accuracy
92
Completeness
88
Source Quality
85
Coherence
91
Objectivity
87
Actionability
84
Depth
89
Timeliness
93
Overall Quality Score
88.6/100
WHY THIS MATTERS

Other Approaches Fall Short

Single model self-evaluation
Biased toward its own output
Most AI tools
Human review only
Slow, expensive, inconsistent
Traditional consulting
No scoring at all
Hope-based quality
ChatGPT, Perplexity
Multi-model consensus scoring
Objective, repeatable, calibrated
PromptReports
AI Output Engineering

Quality You Can Measure.

Not one model's opinion. Statistical consensus across 8 dimensions.

No credit card required
Claims are verified